|
Towards Juristocracy
By
Ran Hirschl
Description
In countries and supranational entities
around the globe, constitutional reform has transferred an
unprecedented amount of power from representative institutions to
judiciaries. The constitutionalization of rights and the
establishment of judicial review are widely believed to have
benevolent and progressive origins, and significant redistributive,
power-diffusing consequences. Ran Hirschl challenges this
conventional wisdom.
Drawing upon a comprehensive
comparative inquiry into the political origins and legal consequences
of the recent constitutional revolutions in Canada, Israel, New
Zealand, and South Africa, Hirschl shows that the trend toward
constitutionalization is hardly driven by politicians\\\' genuine
commitment to democracy, social justice, or universal rights. Rather,
it is best understood as the product of a strategic interplay among
hegemonic yet threatened political elites, influential economic
stakeholders, and judicial leaders. This self-interested coalition of
legal innovators determines the timing, extent, and nature of
constitutional reforms.
Hirschl demonstrates that whereas
judicial empowerment through constitutionalization has a limited
impact on advancing progressive notions of distributive justice, it
has a transformative effect on political discourse. The global trend
toward juristocracy, Hirschl argues, is part of a broader process
whereby political and economic elites, while they profess support for
democracy and sustained development, attempt to insulate policymaking
from the vicissitudes of democratic politics.
Contents
Introduction
1. Four Constitutional
Revolutions
2. The Political Origins of
Constitutionalization
3. Hegemonic Preservation in
Action
4. Constitutionalization and
Judicial Interpretation of Rights
5. Rights and Realities
6. Constitutionalization and the
Judicialization of Mega-Politics
Conclusion: The Road to
Juristocracy and the Limits of Constitutionalization
Notes
Legal Decisions Cited
Acknowledgments
Index
|