|
Framing Contract Law
By
Victor Goldberg
Description
The central theme of this book is that
an economic framework--incorporating such concepts as information
asymmetry, moral hazard, and adaptation to changed circumstances--is
appropriate for contract interpretation, analyzing contract disputes,
and developing contract doctrine. The value of the approach is
demonstrated through the close analysis of major contract cases. In
many of the cases, had the court (and the litigators) understood the
economic context, the analysis and results would have been very
different. Topics and some representative cases include consideration
(Wood v. Lucy, Lady Duff Gordon), interpretation (Bloor v. Falstaff
and Columbia Nitrogen v. Royster), remedies (Campbell v. Wentz,
Tongish v. Thomas, and Parker v. Twentieth Century Fox), and excuse
(Alcoa v. Essex).
Contents
Introduction
Part I Some Concepts
1. The Net Profits Puzzle
Part II Consideration
2. Reading Wood v. Lucy, Lady
Duff Gordon with Help from the Kewpie Dolls
3. Mutuality and the Jobber\\\'s
Requirements: Middleman to the World
4. Satisfaction Clauses:
Consideration without Good Faith
5. Postscript on Freedom from
Contract
Part III Interpretation
6. Discretion in Long-Term Open
Quantity Contracts: Reining in Good Faith
7. In Search of Best Efforts:
Reinterpreting Bloor v. Falstaff
8. Columbia Nitrogen v. Royster:
Do as They Say, Not as They Do
9. The \"Battle of the
Forms:\" Fairness, Efficiency, and the Best-Shot Rule
Part IV Remedies
10. Campbell v. Wentz: The Case
of the Walking Carrots
11. Expectation Damages and
Property in the Price
12. The Middleman\\\'s Damages: Lost
Profits or the Contract-Market Differential
13. An Economic Analysis of the
Lost--Volume Retail Seller
14. Consequential Damages
15. A Reexamination of Glanzer v.
Shepard: Surveyors on the Tort-Contract Boundary
Part V Option to Terminate
16. Bloomer Girl Revisited, or
How to Frame an Unmade Picture
17. Bloomer Girl: A Postscript
18. Wasserman v. Township of
Middletown: The Penalty Clause That Wasn\\\'t
Part VI Impossibility, Related
Doctrines, and Price Adjustment
19. Price Adjustment in
Long--Term Contracts
20. Impossibility and Related
Excuses
21. Alcoa v. Essex: Anatomy of a
Bungled Deal
22. Mineral Park v. Howard: The
Irrelevance of Impracticability
Concluding Thoughts
Notes
References
Table of Cases
Index
|